Mc Crispy
A
Chris Whatshisname on MSNBC can go fuck himself.

And I'll say the same thing to anyone else who tries the "Garland wasn't doing anything" bullshit with me.

Without the two years worth of work the DoJ did, we wouldn't be getting these indictments as quickly as Smith is throwing them out.
08:35 PM - Aug 01, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
23
93
AbbiSeattle1
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
01:22 AM - Aug 02, 2023
3
44
M.A.D. Lib Historian
A
In response to AbbiSeattle1.
Imagine an AG being under such siege, while also having hundreds of other major cases to handle as well. He deserved a Supreme Court seat, Obama was right.
01:34 AM - Aug 02, 2023
1
14
Ground Control
A
In response to AbbiSeattle1.
Is anyone in their right mind going to say no to THAT face?
10:15 AM - Aug 02, 2023
0
1
Martha HC in Va
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
Chris is a Berner, and finds something negative to say about this administration, no matter what.
He said he thought it was probably churlish to criticize Garland like he did - and it was.
11:30 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
5
Reet Petite
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
I wish legacy media would book more informed people instead of the usual talking heads. I’d love to hear someone like Teri Kanefield on these shows https://terikanefield.com/...
08:54 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
2
Jenny Wren (She/Her)
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
08:54 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
2
Hedy Lamarr
B
In response to Mc Crispy.
Except the J6 Committee kept complaining that the DOJ was barely moving on this.

And that they had done more investigating & the DOJ was sitting on it's hands.

So-we might never know if they were moving too slow or what.

I mean the DOJ didn't even have the witnesses the committee had.
08:53 PM - Aug 01, 2023
2
1
Mc Crispy
A
In response to Hedy Lamarr.
A. Both the DoJ and the J6 Committee were unwilling to share info with each other. The committee chairman said as much in hearing 3 or 4.

B. The DoJ is never one to share witnesses, no matter how closely two cases align.
09:07 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
2
JIlda Nettleton
A
In response to Hedy Lamarr.
I suggest you.read Teri Kanefield newsletter on this and also listen to The daily beans
11:45 AM - Aug 02, 2023
0
0
Jenny Wren (She/Her)
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
he works my last nerve with that kinda bullshit constantly
08:48 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
1
Paula Beard
B
In response to Mc Crispy.
You are correct. Jack Smith took all the work previously done, put together a case and added his own input. This was not a one man show and media is full of shit.
08:48 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
3
Mari Tini
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
I never like Chris Hayes's takes on anything.
08:47 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
2
ecsbrooklyn
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
Waiting for him to start pushing RFK Jr.
08:47 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
1
Anna McA
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
💯! I’m extremely tired of all the Garland bashing and whining about the amount of time it takes—especially from people with a large platform and a small amount of information. What if we had Trump/Barr? He would never be held to account in any way. Largest, most complex investigation in history.
08:43 PM - Aug 01, 2023
0
5
Pro-Science Establishment Dem
B
In response to Mc Crispy.
Oh, you mean the douchecanoe with the glasses who stanned for Bernie in 2015 and shit all over Hillary by pushing disinformation, and then took Tara Reade's bullshit seriously?

*That* guy?
08:39 PM - Aug 01, 2023 (Edited)
1
3
Mc Crispy
A
In response to Pro-Science Establishment Dem.
That's the one.
08:40 PM - Aug 01, 2023
1
1
Oliver Gibson
A
In response to Mc Crispy.
Yep. And furthermore bringing someone like Jack Smith into the game. A man who tried war crimes at the Hague. The choice could not have been better.
08:38 PM - Aug 01, 2023 (Edited)
0
4