Andrea Junker
A
Just a casual reminder that in 1869 it was decided to have 9 Supreme Court justices because there were 9 Circuit Courts.

Now there are 13 Circuit Courts. So what exactly are we waiting for?
11:06 AM - Jun 29, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
70
532
bardsandsages
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
This is the type of logic that should be used instead of "we need to counter the GOP" I mean...we do...but that is not a legal or logical basis for doing something. Balancing the case loads of the court by having 1 dedicated justice per district is a legal and logical point.
07:56 AM - Jan 05, 2024
0
1
Young Lesbian Dre
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
More democrats or new political parties to replace the GOP that is DOA...
01:05 AM - Oct 13, 2023
0
2
Schrodinger's Democracy
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
A solid committed House majority and, oh say. 60 Senators with a vision to democracy?

The answer to your question then, is "for hell to freeze over".
07:20 PM - Jul 01, 2023
1
2
Anton Brakhage
A
In response to Schrodinger's Democracy.
A simple majority in both houses would suffice, provided we also acquire a majority of Senators willing to remove the filibuster.
12:04 AM - Apr 23, 2024
0
0
Elizabeth Arnoldi
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
I think the problem (from what I have read) is that it would require Congress to agree. No way will the GOP agree to Biden adding Justices.
02:08 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
2
Dennis Clarke
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
1869. Five yrs after the defeat of the Confederacy. We need to annihilate the current R Confederacy in the next election so it can happen again.
01:16 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
3
PhiNight
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
A Dem majority in both houses to pass a law requiring the SC to keep up w/the number of circuit courts.
Biden would probably sign that. But it has to pass in Congress first.
10:33 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
5
Tyreek Hill
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
All of them should be black women
03:57 AM - Jul 01, 2023
1
2
Rita Boone
A
In response to Tyreek Hill.
Echoing my weekday go-to Stephanie Miller of "The Stephanie Miller Show": "Who is America's warning system?" - Black women!
10:58 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
4
B Knapp
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
"So what exactly are we waiting for?"

Boomers to retire.
03:27 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
2
PS Annie
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
I'm pretty sure it's more complicated than that, but it's a very alluring idea.
Typically whenever someone suggests that there's an easy answer to a complex problem, it's because they don't understand the issues or they're missing essential information.
10:08 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
0
Tim Graf
A
In response to PS Annie.
It actually isn't more complicated than that. Per the Constitution, Congress has the power to determine the size of the court as well as what types of cases the court has jurisdiction over.
10:21 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
3
Honorary Doctor of Sass
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
This misleadingly statement is why people need to take a civics class. We need super majorities to get this passed.
09:43 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
3
Tim Graf
A
In response to Honorary Doctor of Sass.
There's nothing in the Constitution that requires that.
10:20 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
2
KevinC
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
We're waiting for enough Senate votes to amend.
09:12 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
2
Tim Graf
A
In response to KevinC.
No amendment is required. Congress has the power under Article III to change the size of the court. Term limits would require an amendment, but not increasing the number of justices.
10:23 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
3
tedi
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Biden doesn’t know what you’re talking about.
07:22 AM - Jun 30, 2023
0
0
Charlie Mel
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Waiting for (hopefully) the ALL Blue Executive AND Legislative branches of our government in next years General Election.
07:12 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
2
Ronald Alexander
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Waiting on a Congress that will legislate it and just as important an electorate that will demand it
05:10 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
2
Vanessa White
B
In response to Andrea Junker.
It’ll never happen. The Dems are too weak to challenge it.
04:28 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
0
Mindy!!!
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
The votes.
03:11 PM - Jun 29, 2023
1
2
Kinzie Mat
A
In response to Mindy!!!.
YES! This is what drives me absolutely BONKERS when hearing the “Dems are too weak to make it happen” bullshite!!!🤦🏻‍♀️🤪

You’re (person spouting this nonsense) Not Helping!!!!!!!
04:57 AM - Jun 30, 2023
0
2
Didi B-Q
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
To repair this Supreme Court… Vote blue, every election, for every office.
02:09 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
5
Dan Dan
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
I think we're waiting for the ability to do something. The Dem party machine needs to pull it's collective head out of it's collective ass and get people elected
02:00 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
1
Yvette
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Republicans are waiting for the 2nd coming. 🙄🤦‍♀️☮️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
01:53 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
0
Happy4uu&u
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
That stupid exploration committee was just a back handed punt. Is it because "THEY" all conditionally love it the way it is. If, big if, I can only unearth their truth about the system 🤔
01:36 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
1
Professor Kyle
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Control of Congress?
12:31 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
7
Alexander J. McKinley, QBE
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
They're waiting for another tRUmp-like administration so they can increase the court and pack it even further.
11:52 AM - Jun 29, 2023
0
6
Jim Miles
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
This spout was removed because the account associated with it was suspended.
11:46 AM - Jun 29, 2023
0
0
Matt Brown
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Also 18 year term limits.
11:39 AM - Jun 29, 2023
1
5
Tim Graf
A
In response to Matt Brown.
That would require an amendment. Changing the size of the court doesn't.
10:24 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
1
Honorary Doctor of Sass
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
We NEED a real majority in the Senate FFS. #VoteBlue
11:26 AM - Jun 29, 2023
1
7
Professor Kyle
A
In response to Honorary Doctor of Sass.
Right? Enough of this magic wand BS.
12:32 PM - Jun 29, 2023
0
1
Dan Eldredge
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
When I'm not feeling charitable, I blame Biden for not acting.

When I *am* feeling charitable, I think Biden's waiting for one more Senate seat so he can get confirmations through without having to make a deal with Manchin or Sinema.
11:16 AM - Jun 29, 2023
2
6
Professor Kyle
A
In response to Dan Eldredge.
But Biden has no way of acting with control of both houses of Congress and a Senate willing to overturn the filibuster.
12:33 PM - Jun 29, 2023
1
4
Mindy!!!
A
In response to Dan Eldredge.
He needs more than 1 . We need 60 senate seats.
03:14 PM - Jun 29, 2023
2
3
Honorary Doctor of Sass
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Time to get involved.
https://swingleft.org/?utm...
11:08 AM - Jun 29, 2023
0
5
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}