Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
So take those intelligence assessments with a grain of salt. By labeling them "low confidence," they themselves are telling you to do that. 6/6
03:42 PM - Mar 04, 2023
0
0
Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
The FBI showed how unsuited their methods were to such an investigation by botching their conclusions about the anthrax letters sent after 9/11. And they had 7 years to do that. 5/
03:41 PM - Mar 04, 2023
1
0
Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
Most of the agencies involved in the assessment thought, at low confidence, that the jump from animal to human was made at the wild animal market or that there wasn't enough evidence to judge. 4/
03:41 PM - Mar 04, 2023
1
0
Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
The Department of Energy's change in assessment of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 is very small, and joined by no other members of the IC. The FBI recently restated their position, which is an outlier. 3/
03:40 PM - Mar 04, 2023
1
0
Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
Scientific papers are open to all and rely on the collection of facts. Intelligence assessments rely much more on the perceived (and supported) reliablility of sources. 2/
03:40 PM - Mar 04, 2023
1
0
Cheryl Rofer
A
In response to Cheryl Rofer.
The link is to my article summarizing information on the Chinese balloon over the US.
11:05 PM - Feb 02, 2023
0
2
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}