Julie Hancock
A
In response to Julie Hancock.
"The consequences of Wisconsin's Supreme Court race are hard to overstate. Should Protasiewicz . . the court could revisit its 2022 redistricting decision that helped Republicans grow. . . lopsided majorities in the Legislature. Justices could also overturn Wisconsin's pre-Civil War abortion ban."
11:35 AM - Feb 22, 2023
0
0
Julie Hancock
A
In response to Jenni K.
💖Stay on them about the general election in April. The story of how a 2020 Spring Election voted on by a small portion of the state saved the 2020 Presidential election still haunts me!! And isn't told enough. (I hope Ads are run on this before April!)
04:06 PM - Feb 21, 2023
0
1
Julie Hancock
A
In response to Julie Hancock.
Only 15-20% of #Wisconsin Voters elect our State Supreme Court justices, and 100% of the judges decide our access to the voting booth, education, abortion, healthcare, and election outcomes. Please help get that percentage up this year. #VoteWisconsin
03:34 PM - Feb 21, 2023
0
0
Julie Hancock
A
In response to Palmer Report.
This is fairly misleading—two attorneys of Trump’s testified before Jack Smith’s grand jury. We do not know the grand jury is “to indict Trump” or that they “testified against him.” we know there is a grand jury hearing testimony, and to state the rest as fact is irresponsible, or to get clicks.
10:26 PM - Feb 13, 2023 (Edited)
0
0
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}