rimsarah
A
In response to MariMarina (she/her).
THANK YOU SO MUCH for the tip! I was wondering how to make a thread and could not find how! I really appreciate it, thank you!
07:26 AM - Aug 28, 2023
0
1
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
10- Imagine for one second if the French government directed the same energy towards rescuing public schools and services from decay as it does towards scrutinizing Muslim students?
04:06 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
9- If Muslim students decide to leave public schools to go to private ones, they'll be accused of separatism🤷🏻‍♀️. Also who decides what is a religious or not?
04:06 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
8- This type of policy stands in opposition to the liberal core of the 1905 Law on Separation of Church & State—a law we've been distorting and weaponizing since the '90s. Such policies fuel the nation's fractures.
04:06 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
7- Answer: this is a €39,99 H&M long dress. If we follow the logic of the French Education Minister, if worn by a Muslim student, it would violate laïcité🤷🏻‍♀️
04:05 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
6- Abaya or not abaya?
04:04 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
5- Answer: This is a €4.750 Dolce Gabbana dress🤷🏻‍♀️.
04:03 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
1
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
4- Look at this dress? Abaya or not abaya?
04:03 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
3- If a non-Muslim student wears the SAME maxi dress as her Muslim peer, what then? How do we rationalize unequal treatment? Are we going to expel the Muslim student but not the non-Muslim one?
04:02 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
1
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
2-How do we differentiate between a flowing long dress and an abaya, minus resorting to profiling (which is, FYI, against the law)? Is it the school's role to be the fashion police?
04:02 AM - Aug 28, 2023
1
1
rimsarah
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
So far, Spoutible remains my favorite platform. It looks more peaceful and less wild. I really enjoy it! Thank you!
09:53 AM - Aug 03, 2023
0
5
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
6- I am not sharing the link of the video to avoid amplifying their despicable narrative.
09:51 AM - Aug 03, 2023
0
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
5- Since are are at policing women's bodies. More recently, a bunch of pundits working for far-right network CNews would not stop attacking Moroccan football player Nouhaila Benzina, because she wears a hijab, and even asked for her ban.
09:51 AM - Aug 03, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
4- This ban is obviously illegal, but it does not matter. They will keep violating the law and our supreme court's decisions just to push their despicable agenda. BTW, don't be surprised if other mayors follow (not just from the far-right, but also the traditional right).
09:51 AM - Aug 03, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
3-Despite the Council of State's decision, far-right mayor of Fréjus (still on the Riviera) issued a local ban on the wearing of "loose and covering clothing" (targeting in reality burkini) citing safety and hygiene concerns.
09:51 AM - Aug 03, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
2- According to our administrative Supreme court, as no such risk was demonstrated, the ban infringes upon freedom of movement and conscience. You'd think that mayors would stop doing this? Well nope:
09:50 AM - Aug 03, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
I'm still not sure how to do proper threads here. Hope my Spouts aren't too messy or difficult to follow.
06:45 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
7-Let's see what the final decision will be. Already, many politicians are strongly condemning the opinion of the rapporteur public (with your usual dose of weaponization of laïcité,anti-Muslim hatred classic tropes, and so on.
06:44 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
6-the French legislator has been constantly trying (often with success), to extend religious neutrality to individuals and the the public space, which goes against the liberal vision of the 1905 Law of Separation of Church and State.
06:44 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
5-The rapporteur public remind us that FIFA and all international sports federations allow the hijab to be worn during competitions. He also underlined the serious risk of potential attempts to extend the ban on the hijab to other public spaces (which BTW is already the case as
06:43 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
4-For the rapporteur, under the current regulations, women who wear the hijab are excluded and forced to give up any competition and careers due to the monopoly held by the organizing body.
06:43 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
0
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
3-hijab or any religious visible sign might be an issue for national team players as they represent the nation and accomplish a mission of a public service, but the question is debatable for regular players.
06:43 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
1
rimsarah
A
In response to rimsarah.
2-The rapporteur public (whose opinion is generally followed) recommended canceling the ban, stating that wearing the wearing of the hijab does not constitute proselytism or provocation.
06:42 AM - Jun 27, 2023
1
1
rimsarah
A
In response to Shahed Amanullah.
OH WELL end of an era lol
02:59 PM - Jun 07, 2023
0
1
rimsarah
A
In response to Shahed Amanullah.
That's how the Meta world looks like!
04:34 AM - Apr 24, 2023
0
1
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}