Courtney Milan
A
Just to be clear: I’m pretty sure that posting links to romance novels that contain sex scenes violates this policy.
09:17 AM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
4
37
Mustang Sally
A
In response to Courtney Milan.
How so? His TOS is specific enough. Don't post porn, or links to porn or specific porn language. There are romance authors on this site promoting their books, which may or may not contain sexually explicit language. They're not banned. If you don't like the TOS, leave the site.
12:16 PM - Feb 19, 2023
2
15
B. D. Boop
A
Yes. It is. It is specific enough. And what totally crack me up on this lovely Sunday morning is the pearl clutching from the opposite direction. Are people really saying they don’t want to be at a site because it’s very important that they be able to link to books with explicit content?
In response to Mustang Sally.
02:30 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
1
Mustang Sally
A
In response to B. D. Boop.
Romance writers are worried that the books on their website violates the TOS of @Spoutible . That's rubbish. A law writer is worried that if she posts R. Jean Carroll's testimony of what TFG did, that it violates TOS. It's news. I offered to post it. Haven't heard from her yet.
02:49 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
2
B. D. Boop
A
In response to Mustang Sally.
In my grandmother’s generation, this is what was referred to as “borrowing trouble“.
03:15 AM - Feb 20, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}