Dan Wentzel
A
The trolls, bots, and “influencers” who have a financial or propagandist interest in keeping everyone on Twitter will of course come over here to stir the pot, to try and keep any more people from leaving there and coming here.

I see it as a sign that they really see Spoutible as a threat.
07:00 PM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
20
183
Suzanne JaaaNONYA
A
In response to Dan Wentzel.
Also, as some pointed out today, it was COORDINATED.

There were a few people talking shit on a variety of threads to a large # of #Spouters 🤨

This garbage will not stop. Be ready for any type of loser getting bent about something stupid.
#NoMalarkey 💪🖕

https://spoutible.com/thre...
07:36 PM - Feb 19, 2023
2
12
Carolyn
A
It's that they are all repeating the same argument. I still don't understand how people are equating not wanting to see explicit pornography to being anti-LGBTQ.
In response to Suzanne JaaaNONYA.
07:42 PM - Feb 19, 2023
2
5
Dan Wentzel
A
In response to Carolyn.
Well, unfortunately, their argument is not without historical justification. It's not that long ago that any and all LGBTQ content would have been considered "adult" and "pornographic".

But the ones equating "LGBTQ content" with "porn" in this argument today have not been Spoutible's leadership
08:01 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
0
Carolyn
A
In response to Dan Wentzel.
I understand the historical reference but that's not what is going on here at all. I think people just want to start sh*t.
08:06 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
1
Suzanne JaaaNONYA
A
In response to Carolyn.
Cause it was coordinated bullshit?

I had to drop #ReginaGeorge on one of those clowns cause they pulled the “you don’t care about poor/marginalized people!” Lmfao really??? That was, uhh… an entertaining twist in the already ridiculous convo 🤣👏

Vintage talking point. So adorable🖕
07:53 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
1
Carolyn
A
In response to Suzanne JaaaNONYA.
08:04 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}