Adam Deitsch □
A
thread 1/5
I'm waiting for someone to start arguing with their summary. Like, they'll write a spout or two. The AI will do its thing, and they'll be upset it misportrays their words.
09:02 PM - Oct 03, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
7
3
Adam Deitsch □
A
thread 2/5
They'll laugh for a minute or two, maybe. But they're going to want to get things corrected.
09:03 PM - Oct 03, 2023
1
0
Adam Deitsch □
A
thread 3/5
For example: "The author expects someone to argue with their summary, causing the AI to potentially misconstrue their words and resulting in amusement and a desire for corrections." The cause-effect is a bit backwards here, don't you think? Oy.
09:05 PM - Oct 03, 2023
2
0
Adam Deitsch □
A
thread 4/5
I don't believe there'll be a cause-effect issue, dude. You prove it.

"The author anticipates someone disagreeing with their summary, leading to potential misinterpretation by the AI and amusement, followed by a desire for corrections. They believe there may be a cause-effect reversal in the text."
09:08 PM - Oct 03, 2023
1
0
Adam Deitsch □
A
thread 5/5
What I actually predict is a misinterpretation, followed by an argument with the summary... much like you see playing out above. [bangs head on wall]
09:10 PM - Oct 03, 2023
1
0
Joe McCarthy
A
Just a matter of time before the summaries can create an account themselves to perpetuate the argument.
In response to Adam Deitsch □.
09:12 PM - Oct 03, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}