Christopher Bouzy
A
And yet, there isn't any of that here because we actively remove accounts and monitor the accounts that get close to the line. You continue to use hypotheticals as if Spoutible isn't 10 months old.🤷🏾‍♂️
Blair Houghton @BlairHoughton
Yes, but imagine how happy that will make the Russian and Iranian and christofascist troll farms, knowing that people willing to refute them can simply mute and block themselves from seeing and fact-checking their propaganda.

And how happy they'll be to delete your facts as well.
02:59 PM - Dec 17, 2023
04:45 PM - Dec 17, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
46
85
Blair Houghton
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
I'm looking at the future, expecting this to get billion-user big. The black hats are going to get sophisticated about what will get past the moderation, and casual use of the trashcan will help them.

But if anything this day is showing is why we don't do code reviews in the cafeteria...
04:50 PM - Dec 17, 2023
3
0
Michelle King
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
But surely, if an account doesn’t want you to be able to refute them, they will just block *you*. Unless you think blocking shouldn’t be an option either?
04:57 PM - Dec 17, 2023
1
7
Blair Houghton
A
In response to Michelle King.
Good point. Similar mechanism, just broader.

Blocks should probably be reported to moderation automatically as well.

(I can see them rolling their eyes at the workload, but that can be mitigated by how their feed is designed).
05:20 PM - Dec 17, 2023
4
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}