Andrea Junker
A
In 1869 it was decided to have 9 Supreme Court justices at SCOTUS because there were 9 Circuit Courts.

Now there are 13 Circuit Courts. So what exactly are we waiting for?
04:04 PM - Dec 22, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
14
284
PS Annie
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
You're waiting for a Democratic party majority in both houses so you can pass meaningful legislation like this.
01:31 AM - Dec 23, 2023
0
14
FalconWarthog 96
B
In response to Andrea Junker.
We must vote blue to give a Democrat president and Democrat congress the power to appoint justices that are not corrupt and want to destroy our democracy.
09:17 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
5
Kat
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
It's an issue that they politically don't want to resolve. And whomever is in position of power, uses this to prevent the true rule of law to be ascertained.
08:17 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
0
JunieMo1
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Operating out of fear that the other party will expand SCOTUS if/when they're the majority. If it is tied to the number of Circuit Courts, there's no there there! Expansion has needed to happen for years.
07:14 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
3
Howard Chan
B
In response to Andrea Junker.
My guess involves two things:
1. More people need to be aware of this issue.
2. Right wingers, that are in certain positions of power to oppose this, would have to be out of said positions.
05:08 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
3
Jim Plunkett
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Would we need a 2/3 vote in the senate to pass such an expansion?
04:54 PM - Dec 22, 2023
1
4
BigMommaLurka
A
In response to Jim Plunkett.
Not sure. But I fear that 1 cranky Senator can sit on a Justice's confirmation. I'd like to see THAT change.
08:13 AM - Dec 23, 2023
0
0
jocelynjtweet
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
51 Senators who agree with adding justices and who will vote to remove the filibuster from Senate rules
04:45 PM - Dec 22, 2023
1
6
BigMommaLurka
A
In response to jocelynjtweet.
REMOVAL of the filibuster might not be required. Just insist on a old fashioned filibuster. No bathroom breakes!
08:15 AM - Dec 23, 2023
0
1
Lynda Creech
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
💯
04:34 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
0
Bren
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Definitely need to catch up before we get further behind. Times a ticking. Texas, Florida, Missouri etc, etc all the signs are here
04:30 PM - Dec 22, 2023
1
1
Dean Cascarano
A
In response to Bren.
Sadly those are the states we might need to keep senate
04:41 PM - Dec 22, 2023
1
1
Pa Dad
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
Ethics!
04:21 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
0
Dog Lover
A
In response to Andrea Junker.
My first thought and then I donated to Biden Harris campaign.
04:20 PM - Dec 22, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}