Carole Tyler
A
Rep Jasmine Crockett being referred to as "shrill."

I didn't hear shrill. Did you hear shrill?

All I hear is that some people can't handle a fellow human being BEING her badass self.
10:11 AM - Jan 11, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
53
196
Suzanne Chowla
A
In response to Carole Tyler.
Blocked the spouter, but I think his spout was disingenuous (i.e. intentionally provocative, intended to generate outrage that could be screenshotted & shared on other platforms to besmirch Spoutible). In his bio he described himself as a variation on "agent provocateur" (i.e. "thought provocateur")
10:54 PM - Jan 11, 2024
1
1
Carole Tyler
A
In response to Suzanne Chowla.
Read the Spout once, never saw it again. Don't know the handle... It did strike me as perhaps purely provocative. However, teaching moments are teaching moments. Especially since there's so much incomprehensible hatred for women out there...
07:44 AM - Jan 12, 2024
1
1
Suzanne Chowla
A
Fair point, but it was almost certainly just a fishing expedition for outrage. Given his profile content showing him to be an agent provocateur & the way the red meat was served-up on a platter as an obvious lure, there was no reason to see it as a sincere comment or as an actual teachable moment.
In response to Carole Tyler.
10:05 AM - Jan 12, 2024
1
1
Carole Tyler
A
In response to Suzanne Chowla.
Not for him, for sure.
10:06 AM - Jan 12, 2024
1
1
Suzanne Chowla
A
In response to Carole Tyler.
Not for him. I do think that it provided an opportunity for collective misogyny rejection. In the past, such situations have sometimes burned us [🐳] as intentionally-provoked outrage responses devolved (as they were engineered to) into things that looked bad when screenshotted onto other sites.
10:12 AM - Jan 12, 2024 (Edited)
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}