HumTeach
A
thread 1/5
"In 2024, the social, cultural and political fact is that the presidential election is a fully national contest that will play out according to quaint and obscure state rules.
09:31 AM - Feb 09, 2024 (Edited)
0
0
0
HumTeach
A
thread 2/5
For one of the two major-party candidates to be missing from some state ballots and not others could encourage even more Americans to refuse to recognize the election’s legitimacy. I think the court would regard that as abhorrent.
09:31 AM - Feb 09, 2024
0
0
HumTeach
A
thread 3/5
Moreover, it would be virtually impossible for the court to devise a one-size-fits-all solution that bans Trump from the ballot in every state.
09:31 AM - Feb 09, 2024
0
0
HumTeach
A
thread 4/5
The court is not a fact-finding body, and this case doesn’t begin to present the sort of record from which it could conclude that Trump “engaged in insurrection” under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
09:31 AM - Feb 09, 2024
0
0
HumTeach
A
thread 5/5
The justices could find that Colorado’s determination was not in error under federal law, but that’s a far cry from ensuring the same result in every other state.

https://www.latimes.com/op...
09:31 AM - Feb 09, 2024 (Edited)
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}