Christopher Bouzy
A
We have over 100,000 accounts on Spoutible, and only 7 are rated problematic, and 37 are rated disruptive.

For comparison, the disruptive and problematic accounts we monitor on Twitter account for 23% of all the accounts we are monitoring.
07:52 AM - Mar 13, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
40
473
Barbara Jean
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
So the disruptive accounts remain active here???
08:02 AM - Mar 13, 2023
0
1
Tim B
A
I think the idea is that everyone is allowed so long as they don't break the rules - but the label warns people ahead of time if people are not worth engaging with.

That gives the disruptive people a chance to improve their behaviour (since they're getting ignored) while a banning does not.
In response to Barbara Jean.
08:25 AM - Mar 13, 2023
1
7
Barbara Jean
A
In response to Tim B.
Ok but the problematic accounts already have broken rules.( in order to be in that category.) but it's ok, because I just won't engage with anybody that has those ratings.
08:58 AM - Mar 13, 2023
3
0
Tim B
A
In response to Barbara Jean.
There are a lot of grey areas in human interaction.

Yes, accounts that outright break the rules will get dealt with. But there's a lot of behaviour that isn't bad enough to warrant a ban/suspension but is still not great.

This just flags up that behaviour for people to be forewarned.
10:53 AM - Mar 13, 2023
0
2
Rebecca
A
In response to Barbara Jean.
Not necessarily. It can denote that the account engages in behaviour similar to a bot, such as Echoing lots of posts, but not spouting original material. There's nothing inherently wrong with only echoing others, it just raises the flag and allows other users to maybe investigate before engaging.
08:36 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}