Christopher Bouzy
A
I am sharing this to underscore the manipulations often seen in media coverage. As the polls tighten, there is a noticeable decrease in media emphasis on them. To be clear, I still believe you should ignore the polls even with them tightening, but I couldn't help but to highlight the media games.
06:11 AM - Mar 30, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
8
106
Jim Siwek
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 That +7 is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.
08:08 PM - Mar 30, 2024
0
0
Trauma Epidemic
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
The good news: Quinnipiac is the most legitimate on the list.
07:29 PM - Mar 30, 2024
0
0
Niki S. RN
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
This is the kind of 💩that keeps me up at night. Who the hell are they polling????? So i avoid all election news except the stuff you post. I’m only still on Twitter to follow you there and the many epidemiologists I have always followed. But my account there is locked.
06:13 PM - Mar 30, 2024
1
0
Koronin
A
In response to Niki S. RN.
They are polling people who answer the phone for unknown numbers, which isn't that many people and even less the younger the age group gets.
06:34 PM - Mar 30, 2024
0
2
PS Annie
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
It so transparent.
11:05 AM - Mar 30, 2024
0
1
TriXteR Phillips
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
What's that old say? If it bleeds, it leads?
10:29 AM - Mar 30, 2024
0
2
Kos
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
+7 for "Selzer?" +7? Clowns!
10:24 AM - Mar 30, 2024
0
2
Phil Nicolosi
B
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
Your analysis is so appreciated. Your predictions in 2022 were what got me following you on Twitter and eventually following you to Spoutible.
I was wondering if you could shed some light on the rfk effect ?
Will he hurt Biden or the other guy more and do these polls reflect his impact?
07:32 AM - Mar 30, 2024
0
15

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}