Mike Nunya
A
Is it a stretch to think that SCOTUS or the medical insurance industry as a whole might, if the SCOTUS rules against lifesaving abortions, take the next step and try to end EMTALA altogether? If they can refuse to treat miscarriages, what else will they decide not to treat? You know they will.
Helen @tener_duende
"Enacted in the 1980s to address “patient dumping,” EMTALA requires that hospitals that receive federal funds take steps to provide life-saving care to a patient in an emergency condition. After EMTALA, it was no longer lawful for a hospital to leave a patient suffering on the hospital steps..."
07:50 PM - Apr 24, 2024
08:13 PM - Apr 24, 2024 (Edited)
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
0
3

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}