Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 1/10
Let's talk about British Media talking about Harry and Meghan security.
First things first.
This conversation started BEFORE they left the roles of Working Royal. The conversation was startling and unwarranted and very well coordinated. One morning we woke up to Newspapers morning and talk shows
05:50 AM - May 13, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
4
13
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 2/10
All having the same talking points. Our airwaves were unrelenting in questioning why Harry and Meghan had security in Canada. We didn't understand why the conversation was even necessary when Harry had Security from birth, and Suits had hired security for Meghan while she was dating Harry. The
05:50 AM - May 13, 2024
0
8
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 3/10
Chatter never stopped and the narrative continued.
We understand without any equivocation that the absolutely insane discussions are about getting Harry and Meghan killed. They are not even trying to hide it. They are screaming that they want them to lose security deliberately and see what happens
05:50 AM - May 13, 2024
0
8
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 4/10
Now they are back at it again. "Nigeria isn't safe" they say. Well actually no country is safe but Britain has the distinct privilege of having through their legal institutions decided the country will not provide Harry and his family any security. It is Britain NOT Nigeria that is telling the world
09:04 AM - May 13, 2024
0
6
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 5/10
That Harry took 4 security personnel only and that Nigeria security is 10 army vehicles, 2 ambulances, 3 Toyota pick up with mounted machine guns. Why are they informing terrorists the details about his security? Britain is the only country with 2 sets of domestic terrorists convicted and imprisoned
09:09 AM - May 13, 2024 (Edited)
0
6
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 6/10
For threatening Harry Meghan and Archie with death and making plans to do so. It is Britain that has it's Metro Police in court documents saying racist things about Meghan. It is Britain angry about security being provided in other countries why? Why shouldn't other countries provide security? They
09:14 AM - May 13, 2024
0
5
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 7/10
Told Harry and his family that they will never ever provide security no matter what. In fact despite the fact that celebrities can pay for security when they travel in Britain for shows appearances etc, Britain has decided that Harry cannot have that same consideration when he requested it.
09:19 AM - May 13, 2024
0
5
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 8/10
Britain gives security to its former Prime Ministers for life even if they were Prime Minister for months and Harry has had security all his natural life. It is since marrying a black woman that security was stripped arbitrarily. And now today we're listening to them throw tantrums about the stellar
09:23 AM - May 13, 2024
0
6
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 9/10
Security that the Nigerian Army provided. Do they really not understand that Invictus Games Foundation is about troops? If the defense minister invites someone surely he gets to decide how much security he bestows on his guests. They understand that. They just want to make it seem like security is
09:31 AM - May 13, 2024
0
7
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
thread 10/10
Is a hot topic and we should all be talking about it 24/7.
Britain made it a hot topic, Britain wants us to believe that security should be worrying us. It does and it doesn't.
We only worry about security risks and attacks coming from Britain. Britain IS the biggest threat. Always
09:36 AM - May 13, 2024
0
8
Carol Glynn
B
In response to Vuyelwa Ncube.
I thought the Brits were SUPPOSE to be better than this. Shame on King Charles!
11:23 AM - May 13, 2024
1
1
Vuyelwa Ncube
A
In response to Carol Glynn.
They want everyone to believe that but the racist imperialism raises its ugly head and they expose themselves
12:54 PM - May 13, 2024
1
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}