Christopher Bouzy
A
The name Spoutible isn't changing, we will never allow sexually explicit content, and checkmarks aren't for sale. The first two were decided on by the Spoutible community, and the last is just a dumb idea we didn't bother voting on. Paid checkmarks ruined Twitter.
06:22 PM - Apr 03, 2023 (Edited)
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
36
945
G. H. ✅
A
Shouldn't using 2FA be good enough for a check mark, I mean after all there are quite a few here with a check mark from twitter who do you know for sure they're legit and those of Us using 2FA aren't?
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
03:37 AM - Apr 04, 2023
1
0
Barbara Banfield
A
In response to G. H. ✅.
A verified account should be required to use their legal name and have shown proof of identification. The whole point is for people to trust and know that individual has been authenticated.
09:12 AM - Apr 04, 2023
1
0
G. H. ✅
A
In response to Barbara Banfield.
Sounds fine as well the main point was the simple fact so many have a check mark that came from twitter and in the original post it's clearly stated 'paid check marks ruined twitter' so why even allow them here?
01:44 PM - Apr 04, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}