Emma Dingle
A
0% Normal is absolutely the most hilarious inverse way to define acceptable human behaviour.

Is it like the idea of "Going Clear" against a background of baseline awful or something? 🧐

So, if someone os 100% Normal they are Problematic? And Problematic is worse than Disruptive??

Okaaay?

🥴
Curtis Johnson @CurtisJJohnson1
FYI: The blue "normal percentages.
Normal: 0% - 24%
Satisfactory: 25% - 49%
Disruptive: 50% - 74%
Problematic: 75% - 100%
03:46 PM - Apr 13, 2023
06:58 AM - Apr 16, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
8
3
Sabine
A
In response to Emma Dingle.
Thinking about Spoutible´s scoring a bit further, the easiest way to solve the wording issue as well as the scaling issue would include a consistent wording in the vein of
- very acceptable / very welcome
- acceptable / welcome
- less acceptable / less welcome
- least acceptable /least welcome
07:43 AM - Apr 16, 2023 (Edited)
2
1
Jasmine Weidenbach
A
In response to Sabine.
That's a very good point, Sabine. It's consistent.
08:01 AM - Apr 16, 2023
0
0
uOMi
A
In response to Sabine.
Not a fan of the alternative scoring though.

What is disruptive or unacceptable should be clarified. It's a mystery to me, consisting mostly of buzz words.
01:44 PM - Apr 17, 2023
0
0
Sabine
A
In response to Emma Dingle.
Yes, to someone familiar with scales and scaling in general it´s really funny how much they managed to mangle it. To define the limit of acceptable behaviour at 50 % is another feature that makes your hair stand on edge
07:10 AM - Apr 16, 2023
0
1
Megan Kotte
A
In response to Emma Dingle.
If you go into the "more" part of the menu it explains the bot rating.
07:03 AM - Apr 16, 2023
1
2
Sabine
A
In response to Megan Kotte.
read it early on.

The problem Emma wanted to highlight is the wording and the problem I wanted to highlight is the scaling.
07:28 AM - Apr 16, 2023
1
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}