Matt Egan he/him/his
A
In response to Jack Brown.
Is there a viable means by which we can implement ethical standards, legally enforceable, without controlling the White House, both houses of Congress, judicial control in lower courts and an absolute public mandate? The SCOTUS corruption must change, but I'm very dubious about the mechanism to do i
11:47 PM - Apr 30, 2023
0
0
Rosetta
A
In response to Jack Brown.
This is where checks and balances should step in. Congress is not doing its job when it comes to the Supreme Court.
08:53 PM - Apr 30, 2023
0
1
Steve Nelson
A
In response to Jack Brown.
Of course not! What a farce.
08:53 PM - Apr 29, 2023
0
1
Hedy Lamarr
B
In response to Jack Brown.
Considering they were supposedly doing that already, I'd say it hasn't worked so far.
07:18 PM - Apr 29, 2023
0
1
Rob E
A
In response to Jack Brown.
They are not capable of policing themselves, nor should they have the power to police themselves.
07:00 PM - Apr 29, 2023
0
1
Irminsul Harp
A
In response to Jack Brown.
This spout was removed because the account associated with it was suspended.
06:58 PM - Apr 29, 2023
1
0
Matt Egan he/him/his
A
In response to Irminsul Harp.
Never to my knowledge, but in the past the at least mostly stuck to moral standards before the fortunately deceased Scalia and the current conservative (in)justices. Remember*stare decisis* that Trump's picks all lied about during their hearings? Even how his picks were nominated was corrupt😠
11:54 PM - Apr 30, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}