Lisa
A
This needs more coverage!
09:46 AM - May 23, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
11
5
O Aguabonita
A
In response to Lisa.
Well, that's very misleading. 1) the railcar did not go missing. It arrived, but empty. 2) (linked article:)

"The initial assessment is that a leak through the bottom gate on the railcar may have developed in transit,” the company said through a spokesperson.
11:10 AM - May 23, 2023
1
0
Lisa
A
The company has speculated, still no further information on how tens thousands of pounds of explosive components are missing. Not even a “we found a leak” or “we found remnants of the granules.”
In response to O Aguabonita.
12:04 PM - May 23, 2023
1
0
O Aguabonita
A
In response to Lisa.
Yes, but between the fact that no railcar is missing and a plausible explanation has been offered for its emptiness, the headline and lede as presented in the spout are misleadingly alarmist. 'Specially the falsehood that the railcar itsownself was missing. Far more alarming if true, but it isn't.
03:57 PM - May 23, 2023
1
0
Lisa
A
In response to O Aguabonita.
Nowhere does it say that the railcar was missing. It says shipment, which is what is being shipped, not the ship. The explanation came from the chemical company as a possibility, not an official who is investigating. Timothy McVey used 2 tons of the same chemical to bring down the federal building
04:33 PM - May 23, 2023
1
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}