Lisse (she/her)
A
How dare Kavanaugh and his SCOTUS 5, say that The Navajo, who have been here longer than the US; is not entitled to RUNNING WATER!

The 1868 treaty he says, "did not require the U.S. to take affirmative steps to secure water for the tribe."

#IndigenousRights
#water
#NavajoWaterRights
01:26 PM - Jun 22, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
25
82
O Aguabonita
A
Pretty sure that headline, and especially the subhed, mis-states the ruling, which wasn't that the Navajo didn't have those treaty rights to water, but rather that the treaty didn't obligate the fed gov't to quantify the amount of water they have the rights to. Still bad, but accurate's better.
In response to Lisse (she/her).
01:52 PM - Jun 25, 2023
1
2
Lisse (she/her)
A
In response to O Aguabonita.
Agreed. And I did understand that. If you do read the article, it does state that. My inaccuracy in explaining this all was in my limit to 300 characters, and anger about the ruling.

Thanks for pointing that out.
02:23 PM - Jun 25, 2023
1
1
O Aguabonita
A
In response to Lisse (she/her).
Actually, I think the inaccuracy wasn't yours, but Spoutible's. The bot or algorithm (or whatever it is) that turns links into photo/headline/subhed is very cool, but sometimes introduces some pretty serious inaccuracies that deviate from the content of the link. As in this case.
04:05 PM - Jun 25, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}