Tristan Snell
A
And if the entire case was fabricated to create a test case for the Supreme Court?

Then all the lawyers involved should be disbarred.

And every organization involved should be investigated for violating 501c3 regs, barred from appearing before SCOTUS, and potentially dissolved
01:54 PM - Jul 02, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
13
307
RealAntifaHQ
A
Over 200 years of #SupremeCourt jurisprudence required ACTUAL harm that the laws complained-of inflicted on the Plaintiff(s).
#303Creative had NO ACTUAL HARM so how would strict scrutiny, or the lower standard, rational basis, be applied?
#FederalistSociety agenda running-over our law & history
In response to Tristan Snell.
03:22 PM - Jul 03, 2023
1
8
Jeanne S
A
In response to RealAntifaHQ.
Actual or threatened harm. That would have been fine but the person who she said contacted her about a website was not gay and is married so the entire premise if false & he never contacted her. How does this get to the Supreme Court without this person ever testifying?
04:11 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
2

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}