Tristan Snell
A
And if the entire case was fabricated to create a test case for the Supreme Court?

Then all the lawyers involved should be disbarred.

And every organization involved should be investigated for violating 501c3 regs, barred from appearing before SCOTUS, and potentially dissolved
01:54 PM - Jul 02, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
13
307
Russell Whittemore
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
This is all simply the politics of naked, fascist power. Elections have consequences (looking at you, "but her emails!" morons). The calculus here is that Dems can't get the trifecta in 2024, so there will be no reckoning. The only way forward is to nuke the Rethuglicans at the polls in 2024.
10:06 AM - Jul 04, 2023
0
2
Lisa Starr
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Wasn't Mr. Manly Man Alpha Male Josh Hawley's wife the attorney who litigated this case for plaintiff? If so, did she know her client was (allegedly) perpetrating a fraud on the court?
06:05 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
1
Bethany Garden Witch
B
In response to Tristan Snell.
How do we make this happen?
04:48 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
1
Stevens
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Alas, none of that will happen, and no one will be talking about this by the end of the summer.
04:44 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
1
Irminsul Harp
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
This spout was removed because the account associated with it was suspended.
03:58 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
3
RealAntifaHQ
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Over 200 years of #SupremeCourt jurisprudence required ACTUAL harm that the laws complained-of inflicted on the Plaintiff(s).
#303Creative had NO ACTUAL HARM so how would strict scrutiny, or the lower standard, rational basis, be applied?
#FederalistSociety agenda running-over our law & history
03:22 PM - Jul 03, 2023
1
8
Jeanne S
A
In response to RealAntifaHQ.
Actual or threatened harm. That would have been fine but the person who she said contacted her about a website was not gay and is married so the entire premise if false & he never contacted her. How does this get to the Supreme Court without this person ever testifying?
04:11 PM - Jul 03, 2023
0
2
Mike Calimari
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Joe needs a mean streak or a spine.
He should be on the phone to his consigliere Merrick Garland about going after all involved.
05:53 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
3
Maura
B
In response to Tristan Snell.
Including the justices that ruled in favor
05:17 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
3
Fearlessgirl24
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
How on earth could the case make it to SCOTUS without anyone questioning standing?
04:59 PM - Jul 02, 2023
1
8
Dora Exploring
A
In response to Fearlessgirl24.
I can't believe standing isn't first thing confirmed. You hear about it so much. I refuse to believe this report.
08:33 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
4
Steven May
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
It would be bad enough as a hypothetical. But this seems like perjury and fraud. The whole point was to get it to SCOTUS, based on lies.

And how did not a single court or lawyer talk to the guy who was supposed to be the customer?
04:03 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
8
Susan Bialas
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Well stated
01:58 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
0
RobinForman
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
It’s unfathomable that the case was fabricated, yet here we are. if there aren’t repercussions, we’re doomed to keep making the same mistakes.
01:57 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
5

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}