♿ ♀️ Laura Durnell
A
This means @cbouzy is doing something right. One new user called Christopher Bouzy "thin skinned" for referencing Spoutible policy on adult content that most likely received legal vetting.
Dan Wentzel @DanWentzel
The trolls, bots, and “influencers” who have a financial or propagandist interest in keeping everyone on Twitter will of course come over here to stir the pot, to try and keep any more people from leaving there and coming here.

I see it as a sign that they really see Spoutible as a threat.
07:00 PM - Feb 19, 2023
07:24 PM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
3
78
Karistina Lafae
A
In response to ♿ ♀️ Laura Durnell.
That user clerked for Sandra Day O'Connor on SCOTUS and was trying to get Christopher to clarify the policy better because it leaves too much interpretation to the whims of the moderators.

What is "artistic?" That's a legit legal concern because that question has been unanswered for centuries.
08:03 PM - Feb 19, 2023
2
0
Barb Hrmn
A
In response to Karistina Lafae.
I've been a moderator on a sm site. No matter how clear the rules are, all moderators interpret them differently. It's up to owner/mgr to train them. There is usually an ability to ask real time if you have a question as a moderator. No one, no explanation, is perfect.
08:08 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
0
♿ ♀️ Laura Durnell
A
In response to Karistina Lafae.
I read the policy. I don't have a law degree and it's clear to me. If some one doesn't understand what is artistic versus porn, I can't help them. I have an MFA and am a literary writer. I have not interest in dialoguing with you further.
08:08 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
0
Salma Typhii
A
In response to ♿ ♀️ Laura Durnell.
Wait? Is that a dog whistle I hear? I'm surprised they didn't say he's "angry"
07:30 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}