Christopher Bouzy
A
There will always be a small few that will try to ruin it for the many. I am annoyed that a group of romance novelists attempted to drag the LGBTQ+ community into it. The policy doesn't target the LGBTQ+ community nor discriminate against the LGBTQ+ community.
Emily Sugarloaf @ESugarloaf
Some of these new complainers are getting on my last nerve. We had not one problem until this morning. Now they're here 2 days & stamping their feet & demanding I want it MY way, fck the TOS....that I willingly signed onto.
06:57 PM - Feb 19, 2023
08:44 PM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
13
324
Deb Royce
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
Those debating @cbouzy remind me of the men who are baffled by policies prohibiting sexual harassment, worried they’ll make a “mistake.” The obvious reply is, if you have to ask that question, don’t say/do it. Same principle here. If you worry posting content will get you banned, don’t post it.
08:55 PM - Feb 19, 2023
5
183
RavenOnthill
A
In response to Deb Royce.
So…no women's health information? Can one state one's sexual orientation? If one is a sex worker, can one say that?
09:07 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
4
Myke
A
Half* my Spouts have been about #Abortion and #Trans rights, so yes.
In response to RavenOnthill.
09:18 PM - Feb 19, 2023 (Edited)
1
0
RavenOnthill
A
In response to Myke.
OK, good.

There are large and well-heeled organizations that are looking to silence you, and there will be pressure on Spoutible to turn a vague policy against you, no, historically, will be turned against you.
09:20 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
1
Myke
A
In response to RavenOnthill.
Half* my posts, pardon the typo. Yeah no, I've been fighting the good fight unchallenged. I think it's just a very wide ban on actual sexual content. Which I don't hateeee since "Explore" shows everyone Spouts from anyone.
09:23 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}