ANDY FRIZZELL
A
The thing is, films are ‘make believe’ it’s pretending to be real. So why in the world was live ammunition anywhere near a film set!? Why have real guns, able to fire live ammunition been used when fake ‘safe’ guns are available? - Rust movie shooting: Four moments from the first day of trial
03:19 AM - Feb 23, 2024
Avatar
0
7
1
Ray King
A
In response to ANDY FRIZZELL.
Some producers and directors want to make the movie feel authentic using real ammo instead of fake guns. Obviously it was pure negligence to be leaving loaded weapons around on a movie set without them being fully secured. But I agree with you about not using real ammo because it can be deadly.
03:56 AM - Feb 23, 2024
2
0
Geannie Bastian
A
In response to Ray King.
Yeah, but that wasn’t it. The gun was handed to him and he was told it was “cold” (no live ammo) but it wasn’t and the person whose job it was hadn’t checked.

But they weren’t supposed to be using live ammunition, some people were screwing around between takes with it. Awful.
04:49 AM - Feb 23, 2024
1
0
ANDY FRIZZELL
A
In response to Ray King.
F*** the producers and the directors, their authenticity is someone else’s life! Live ammunition adds nothing and with modern techniques effects are there to be created in the edit.
05:48 AM - Feb 23, 2024
1
0
ANDY FRIZZELL
A
In response to ANDY FRIZZELL.
I used to work in the film and TV industry here in the UK. We had guns as props on certain dramas and crime reconstructions. They were strictly controlled and an armourer was present at all times and taken away immediately after the scene. Simple protocols save lives and our weren’t live!
03:28 AM - Feb 23, 2024
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}