Dee Incognito
A
We should all be horrified that SCOTUS thinks there is an argument to be made that the President has absolute immunity.
05:16 PM - Feb 28, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
4
22
William Tulloch
A
It is possible they wasn't to make clear that official actions taken as President for the good of the nation are considered immune, but criminal acts like 1/6 are not. Here's hoping.
In response to Dee Incognito.
05:27 PM - Feb 28, 2024
2
1
Dee Incognito
A
In response to William Tulloch.
They could have clarified that in future cases. They could have said they'd hear it but not grant the stay. I want to believe you, but this court has been irresponsible for years now. I've gone from little faith in it to zero faith.
05:35 PM - Feb 28, 2024
0
1
Archie Leach
A
In response to William Tulloch.
No. "For the good of the nation" is subjective and undefined so it offers zero clarification.
05:32 PM - Feb 28, 2024
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}