Simon Sands
A
But the idea that contraception and gender-affirming care are inherently bad because they “break” our “natural biology” — and open the door to further enhancements of the human body — is a quasi-religious argument, not a rational one.
🥳LONG BUT A WELL WRITTEN ARTICLE🤗
11:11 AM - Apr 23, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
17
4
Martini C
A
In response to Simon Sands.
When I see this, I think what would bell hooks, Harriet Tubman and Audre Lorde say:

American conservatives are cozying up to British feminists who argue that the sexual revolution has hurt women.
11:43 AM - Apr 23, 2024
1
0
Simon Sands
A
In response to Martini C.
Yes thats their point and to me that does not make any kind of sense....
12:20 PM - Apr 23, 2024
1
0
Martini C
A
It's just another path for these sadists to get their eugenics on.
In response to Simon Sands.
12:21 PM - Apr 23, 2024
1
1
Simon Sands
A
In response to Martini C.
🤔interesting....
12:29 PM - Apr 23, 2024
2
0
Martini C
A
In response to Simon Sands.
Talking about the sexual revolution when women are still underpaid and their work undervalued?
How does wringing hands about birth control get women closer to their work being valued and properly compensated whether they are homemakers, secretaries or CEOs?
12:30 PM - Apr 23, 2024
1
0
Martini C
A
In response to Simon Sands.
The baseline is there is no policing of men's sexual habits and freedom?
12:37 PM - Apr 23, 2024
1
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}