Christopher Bouzy
A
Hope Hicks testified against Trump in the New York criminal case.

Accuracy Alert!

Based on the credible sources, it can be concluded that Hope Hicks, a former aide and communications director for Donald Trump, did testify in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial. However, the sources do not make it clear if she testified against Trump, hence the overtone of her testimony remains unvalidated. The trial is related to a hush money case from Trump's 2016 campaign. Hicks' emotional testimony was noted, but the content and implications of her testimony are not sufficiently detailed in the sources to claim that she testified against Trump.

06:23 AM - May 04, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
15
71
T. Naught
A
i like that the menu option has escalated to “challenge fact check”
now that the (auto generated) fact check content is present. 😎
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
06:48 AM - May 04, 2024 (Edited)
2
4
Pamela B'well
A
In response to T. Naught.
Here’s my question for the “Accuracy Alert” determination:

Since Hope Hicks was a witness for the prosecution, doesn’t that mean she did indeed testify “against” the defendant?

@cbouzy
10:36 AM - May 04, 2024
1
2
frog_enabler
A
In response to Pamela B'well.
Not sure. She testified for the prosecution & wasn't a hostile witness. Her testimony was damaging to DFG. But if we say, "she testified against him," it does sound like she did it purposely. It was clear that she did not want to be there. She wanted to work for him. It was a good gig for her!
11:01 AM - May 04, 2024
1
2
Sabine
A
In response to T. Naught.
now that 10 people want to challenge it, it is gone? What happened / what happens now?
10:03 AM - May 04, 2024
2
2
T. Naught
A
In response to Sabine.
interesting… yeah, that option is gone for me too. maybe this represents the successful/definitive resolution of all challenging?
10:24 AM - May 04, 2024
0
0
Daryl Knee
A
In response to Sabine.
not sure ...
10:25 AM - May 04, 2024
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}