Jake Vermaelen
A
I see a bunch of accounts suggesting we ban the AR-15, but I don't think that solves the problem. There are endless other high capacity semiautomatic rifles. I think we need to stop the sale, transfer, and ownership of mags with over ten round capacity.

What do you find more effective?

Ban AR-15 platform rifles

No more hi-cap mags

12 votes — 12:46 PM - Mar 18, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
9
4
Dave Solo
A
In response to Jake Vermaelen.
Banning .223 and .556 ammunition for civilian use is also key. It was designed to maximally wound on the battlefield while producing minimal recoil. 5.7mm pierces body armor with nearly 0 recoil.
02:05 PM - Mar 18, 2023
0
1
Tony_Bell
A
In response to Jake Vermaelen.
I think multiple tacks are necessary to attenuate the incidence of involuntary gun-related deaths & injuries.
- Mirror w/regard to semi-automatic firearms the constraints on automatic ones.
- Increase the culpability for misuse of firearms one owns (see pic below).
- Elect Dems
01:12 PM - Mar 18, 2023
0
0
Bun the Franky
A
In response to Jake Vermaelen.
I find the most effective is putting a $50 tax on each round of ammunition sold, publicly or privately. The Constitution says nothing about the right to bear hundreds of rounds of ammo.
12:57 PM - Mar 18, 2023
2
2
Jennifer Mulvaney
A
In response to Bun the Franky.
Yep, and track the sale of ammunition like we do with allergy meds. If I have to give my ID and signature for Claritin to make myself better, they should have to do it for something that could kill me.
03:50 PM - Mar 18, 2023
1
2
Jake Vermaelen
A
In response to Bun the Franky.
This is good.
06:03 PM - Mar 18, 2023
1
1
NancyM
A
In response to Jake Vermaelen.
Why not both?
12:48 PM - Mar 18, 2023
1
3
Jake Vermaelen
A
In response to NancyM.
That's fair.
06:01 PM - Mar 18, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}