Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 1/3
I'm kind of annoyed when I see something saying @Spoutible won't be successful until big names come. Guess my definition of success is different. b/c I think this site is already excellent. I feel we're all big names & no checks spouters can be just as engaged & have followers as blue checks.
08:47 PM - May 06, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
44
163
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 2/3
Even more so since you need other spouters to have an active timeline. If I only followed the "Names," I'd see very little activity. However, I do have ppl I would love to see here too, but only b/c if they were here, I'd delete bird app entirely.
09:03 PM - May 06, 2023
1
15
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 3/3
Even without them, I'm having a whale of a time and following a vast pod of blue checks, and mostly not blue checks. This is my favorite social site.

OK, I'm stepping off my soap box & going back to watching #nwsl soccer.
09:07 PM - May 06, 2023
0
20
Khrissy Choate
A
I think Spoutible is pretty damned successful as well. It’s kind of hard to get “big names” here when so many of them seem to be falling over themselves to get bluesky.
In response to Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®.
08:51 PM - May 06, 2023
1
1
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
In response to Khrissy Choate.
I'm happy here, and honestly, I don't even follow that many "big names" on the bird site, either. Mostly just some of the politicians or leaders in the Democratic party & POTUS.
09:37 PM - May 06, 2023
1
1
Be Human
A
In response to Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®.
I too am happy here ❤️
10:00 PM - May 06, 2023
1
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}