Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 1/3
I'm kind of annoyed when I see something saying @Spoutible won't be successful until big names come. Guess my definition of success is different. b/c I think this site is already excellent. I feel we're all big names & no checks spouters can be just as engaged & have followers as blue checks.
08:47 PM - May 06, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
44
163
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 2/3
Even more so since you need other spouters to have an active timeline. If I only followed the "Names," I'd see very little activity. However, I do have ppl I would love to see here too, but only b/c if they were here, I'd delete bird app entirely.
09:03 PM - May 06, 2023
1
15
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 3/3
Even without them, I'm having a whale of a time and following a vast pod of blue checks, and mostly not blue checks. This is my favorite social site.

OK, I'm stepping off my soap box & going back to watching #nwsl soccer.
09:07 PM - May 06, 2023
0
20
Lisa W FirstWave
A
I agree! Many of the big names don't even follow people back unless the other people have big names. If they want great engagement here they will have to follow people back. I have engaged with a lot of people here and I love it, Big names or not! Let's go those of us without Big Names!!!!!
In response to Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®.
08:53 PM - May 06, 2023
1
3
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
In response to Lisa W FirstWave.
Absolutely! If you spout something I like or am interested in, then I don't care what your name is or if you have a blue check. I like to interact with ppl.
09:33 PM - May 06, 2023
1
3
Lisa W FirstWave
A
In response to Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®.
Me too and that is how it should be. Spoutible will be better then other platforms because we really enjoy interacting with each other. Did you join our dance Party?
09:36 PM - May 06, 2023
1
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}