Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 1/3
I'm kind of annoyed when I see something saying @Spoutible won't be successful until big names come. Guess my definition of success is different. b/c I think this site is already excellent. I feel we're all big names & no checks spouters can be just as engaged & have followers as blue checks.
08:47 PM - May 06, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
44
163
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 2/3
Even more so since you need other spouters to have an active timeline. If I only followed the "Names," I'd see very little activity. However, I do have ppl I would love to see here too, but only b/c if they were here, I'd delete bird app entirely.
09:03 PM - May 06, 2023
1
15
Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®
A
thread 3/3
Even without them, I'm having a whale of a time and following a vast pod of blue checks, and mostly not blue checks. This is my favorite social site.

OK, I'm stepping off my soap box & going back to watching #nwsl soccer.
09:07 PM - May 06, 2023
0
20
Matt Egan he/him/his
A
If they think we don't have big names, they haven't looked around here very much. Let me preface that: we don't have Kardashian, but we have journalists, scientists, psychologists, you know, the actual big names. Give me our "big names" over celebrity and reality tv trash any day. I doubt I'm alone!
In response to Ramsey, Queen of Popcorn®.
09:15 PM - May 06, 2023
1
4
Anton Brakhage
A
In response to Matt Egan he/him/his.
We also have some entertainment folks, but quality ones. I know we have Jeri Ryan, Jason Alexander, and Neil Gaiman off the top of my head, probably some others I don't follow.

If you just want to hang around people who got famous by being jackasses, the bird app is probably more your speed, yeah.
09:35 PM - May 06, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}