NetMaven 🐠🐠
A
It's good to see Justice Jackson standing strong! ⚖️
11:23 PM - Jun 01, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
3
23
EMJAYESS
A
In response to NetMaven 🐠🐠.
I can see why they ruled this way, but the ruling should have been narrower. If people are in imminent danger, they should be allowed to walk off the job, for example.
02:06 AM - Jun 02, 2023
0
1
Jade Bliss
A
In response to NetMaven 🐠🐠.
Amy Coney Barrett wrote: “the drivers engaged in a sudden cessation of work that put Glacier’s property in foreseeable and imminent danger.” what a weird phrase: property in danger. At risk of damage, inoperable…but danger? And didn’t she throw at roe with no protections for women at risk of death?
01:44 AM - Jun 02, 2023
0
1
Karen Thompson
A
In response to NetMaven 🐠🐠.
8-1. Good on her.
11:25 PM - Jun 01, 2023
0
2

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}