Pamela Keith
A
But Jack Smith didn’t charge a single count related to sharing or selling information.

I find that weird. Don’t you?
Wayne Patterson @suprsidr
CIA was spooked in 2021 when dozens of informants went missing or were killed, when Trump was showing classified documents to people with no clearance at Mar-a-Lago.
Please share.
#TrumpCrimes
08:13 AM - Jun 17, 2023
11:40 AM - Jun 17, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
13
12
Dan Eldredge
A
In response to Pamela Keith.
Not really. Re: selling, it's likely that not enough evidence has yet been found to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump sold classified info. Re: sharing info, I suspect enough evidence has been found to prove it, but not charged for two possible reasons: 1. Smith deemed the crimes already
11:58 AM - Jun 17, 2023
1
1
Dan Eldredge
A
charged are more than sufficient to put Trump away for life, so there's no need for additional counts. 2. It's possible that the info illegally shared is sensitive enough that DOJ has decided not to call too much attention to it.

While Trump stole hundreds of documents, there's only 31 counts of
In response to Dan Eldredge.
12:01 PM - Jun 17, 2023
1
0
Dan Eldredge
A
In response to Dan Eldredge.
willful retention. Why? Probably two reasons: 1. 31 counts are sufficient to 'make the point' of what he did, and 2. Those 31 docs may (I'm unclear on this) have to been shown to the attorneys & jury, so a selection was made of some of the *least* sensitive docs for the 31 counts. It's very likely
12:03 PM - Jun 17, 2023
1
0
Dan Eldredge
A
In response to Dan Eldredge.
that the *most* sensitive docs that Trump stole will remain unknown because the US govt doesn't want it generally known that said info was stolen. So they only will reveal what is strictly necessary to convict Trump, and nothing more.

For example, Count 19 refers to a document "concerning
12:06 PM - Jun 17, 2023
1
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}