Tristan Snell
A
This out-of-control Supreme Court must be reformed:

— 13 justices
— single 18-year term
— binding code of ethics
— full investigation of corrupt gifts
12:44 PM - Jun 30, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
19
221
C Carstens
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
I think that we should put 13 justices on the Supreme Court and watch the evangelical "christians" go nuts! Ha Ha! Then start calling it a Coven instead of a court. Maybe we could finally get rid of Kavanaugh and Comey Barrett that way. Also, term limits for justices are a good idea.
04:07 PM - Oct 10, 2023
0
1
Eric B
B
In response to Tristan Snell.
First the Dems have to keep the Senate and take over the house again. We must register voters and explain all of the bills the Dems have passed and how they're working for average Americans.
07:14 PM - Jul 02, 2023
1
3
Vanessa White
B
In response to Eric B.
Not just keep. 51/49 ain’t gonna cut it. You see that happening?
11:51 PM - Jul 05, 2023
1
2
Fun in Dysfunction 👁♥️🧠s
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Yes, please!
02:14 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
0
Sean Miller
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Im good with this idea as long as the ethics violation penalties have teeth.
12:49 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
4
Matthew Clayton
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
I’ve been saying this several times & have to say it again. If Alito or Clarence bite it fall 2024, Biden and Schumer have to give Senate Rs a taste of their own medicine. Fill that seat with a hardcore liberal with that 51 seat majority.
10:38 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
5
eTrix☮️❤️?
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Corruption in the highest court in the land should result in expulsion and jail, if found guilty. Shouldn’t have to be said, but this shit is galling.
10:28 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
6
Angelique Yaich
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
outside investigations, no organization should regulate itself.
04:55 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
6
Kristine Erickson
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
18 years is too long. No longer than 12 would be my choice. And let's review pensions also.
01:25 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
4
Cindy
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Biden won't do it.
01:23 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
0
Carla Vivarttas
B
In response to Cindy.
Biden cannot do it. Congress has the authority, except for term limits, which would require an amendment to the US Constitution.
10:08 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
5
Connell McGrath
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
I like 13 but why that number?
12:58 PM - Jun 30, 2023
2
0
klotzilla
A
In response to Connell McGrath.
Thirteen federal districts. When nine became enshrined as the number of Justices, there were only nine federal districts. The nation has grown a bit. Time to expand the Supreme Court.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org...
01:02 PM - Jun 30, 2023 (Edited)
0
7
Nancy Harris
A
In response to Connell McGrath.
13 appellate courts...when there were nin e courts there were nine justices..need more justice to represent population
12:27 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
1
Cameron L. Mitchell
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Why aren't the Democrats doing anything about the out-of-control extreme MAGA GOP Supreme Court?

This Democrat is getting tired of the ppl I'm voting for doing nothing as the #IllegitimateSCOTUS destroys this country

@RitchieTorres @Joaquincastrotx
12:49 PM - Jun 30, 2023
2
2
William Tulloch
A
In response to Cameron L. Mitchell.
I understand the frustration, but because we rely on the not-really-Democrats Sinema and Mancin, who would never support such things, and the House in the control of the #MAGA #Deplorables , we're stuck for now.
12:58 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
3
Nancy Harris
A
In response to Cameron L. Mitchell.
Get outand register people to vote thennnn
12:27 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
0

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}