Chuck Charles
A
In response to Media/West Prods..
Wireless. Nice.
08:14 PM - Apr 18, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Max Prophet.
It does seem literally incredibly bad. As in beyond credible.
12:00 AM - Mar 18, 2023
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Max Prophet.
Not to be simplistic, but wouldn’t a local host population of Coronaviruses be where you put a lab to study that?

Looks super bad, and then things have gone super bad. Hard to see an upside for them coming clean, and they spent two years trying hardest to avoid mass infection.
11:54 PM - Mar 17, 2023
1
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Max Prophet.
I think the idea is it has multiple modes of transmission. Because it’s good at infecting cells. Also good at infecting animals, like humans, through respiratory transmission during the acute phase of infection.
11:50 PM - Mar 17, 2023
1
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Max Prophet.
Not sure what is precluded here. Doesn’t everything suggest the labs there would have the data to showing the links and historical samples to prove it was established?

They knew it wasn’t respiratory all along?

Maybe two lies can get around the world before the truth get’s it’s shoes on.
11:28 PM - Mar 17, 2023
2
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
Those infections seeded a global population of hosts with chronic infections, which grew into a pathogenic hellstorm.
11:18 PM - Mar 17, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
We seem unable to grasp that #SARSCoV2 evolution does not occur in the same timeframe as our perception.

Countless proliferating evolutionary paths are being explored simultaneously in a context that has massive payoff for a breakthrough which can defeat remaining immune responses.
08:10 PM - Mar 17, 2023 (Edited)
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
Finally. An opportunity to shamelessly beg for attention for a useful reason.

Look at my rating. It’s low because I’m a human who avoids robots and my posts prove the point.
02:39 PM - Mar 14, 2023
0
7
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Tristan Snell.
Spoiler alert: Yes it was deliberate.

Organized crime used captured political, business and financial officeholders to loosen regulation in order to hollow out financial institutions as part of the same scheme laundering money through meme stocks, PPE fraud and crypto.

They wanted a bank run
02:36 PM - Mar 14, 2023
0
3
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
That’s how they can steal trillions in wealth, without collapsing everything.

That’s why a bank run won’t happen.

They already stole most of everything and are spending all their time, effort and our resources trying to hide the loot.
02:29 PM - Mar 14, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Rep. Ritchie Torres.
Yes.
02:22 PM - Mar 14, 2023
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Clarke.
Evidently fucking not. My rating remains unchanged.

Pardon the epithets, they’re supporting evidence.
05:13 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Lenny P..
0% normal would be way less offensive to me than 3% normal.

But it’s just the flavor of the week for performative victim hood. Fun for writing jokes though.
04:59 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Clarke.
I was just fucking cussing! I have to cuss every time!?
04:56 PM - Mar 13, 2023
1
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
I made this and I have to say it’s possibly one of the most disruptive thoughts I’ve ever had.
04:54 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
Fascinating replies.

I have a devious strategy. If I think an actual human being is trying to communicate, I try to be responsive.

If I think it’s plausibly a robot or a person acting in bad faith, I’m off the hook.

It generally takes very few decisions. Show compassion or effort, you get i
04:32 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Dr. Lucky Tran.
Such an obvious and expensive political gaffe even from a totally sociopathic perspective, it seems our societies are reacting tactically, not strategically, at the highest levels.
03:53 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
Because if it’s the second one (it obviously is) it’s another branch of the same criminal conspiracy that tried an insurrection in DC and an invasion in Ukraine.
01:36 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Barbara Edelman.
Not looked closely at it, but would guess that it maps network relations and similarities to known bots is a factor.

Worth thinking about and applying to your contacts with a critical eye.
01:04 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
Hey our scores are the same. That’s fun.
12:17 PM - Mar 13, 2023
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
In my area very few ever mask, and have not for years now.
10:57 AM - Mar 13, 2023
1
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Licia.
Definitely see how that is be upsetting.

Hard not to see the juxtaposition though. At least some of the community care enough about someone to make that effort.

Why do so few in my community, without even excuses like recklessness and naivety of youth, fail to make even that effort?
10:56 AM - Mar 13, 2023
2
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to MEAction NOW.
That’s interesting, I’ve seen reports that the Fed is taking action to insure depositors beyond FDIC protection.

That doesn’t sound like they have the funds. But maybe it’s more complicated.
10:05 PM - Mar 12, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Licia.
I’m envious. Can’t help but imagine how my life would be different if my local community had similar values. Or what the consequences of the choices made will be.
07:38 PM - Mar 12, 2023
2
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Licia.
A sane and legitimate response.
07:10 PM - Mar 12, 2023
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Chuck Charles.
Worth giving a thought if someone you know begins acting strangely, they may need real and immediate help and be unable to realize it.

Sadly all of us may need to be more broadly aware now.
01:27 PM - Mar 12, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to Silke Spoutista.
It seems to be well understood that medical practitioners and caregivers are as, or more constrained by medical administration than those seeking care.

Really shocking that a system meant to heal people spends so much money deciding who gets healed.
02:38 PM - Mar 11, 2023 (Edited)
0
1
Chuck Charles
A
In response to RA.
To be totally clear, the vast majority of us would be dead or never have been born if it were not for the effort to save lives made by countless individuals across every culture for centuries.
12:06 PM - Mar 11, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to RA.
Not sure we’re looking at the same view.

Europe is a fraction of the planet and their stories get alot of screen time, but human history is much bigger, and without question the overall quality of human life is averaging better.

But oligarchy, slavery and bigotry are human problems.
12:03 PM - Mar 11, 2023
0
0
Chuck Charles
A
In response to RA.
Worth zooming out further, notice we’re in the same struggle humanity has been wrestling since time immemorial, besting our avarice and ignorance.

We may not be as close to succeeding as we like, but being able to see things clearly helps.
11:43 AM - Mar 11, 2023
2
1
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}