Jade Hellcat
A
I guess I'm confused how "no pornography" rule equates to anti LGBTQ+. I'm not defending anyone. I am personally unsure about the vagueness of the wording, but I know it would be impossible to include every single thing in a ToA.
Just not sure how it's anti LGBTQ+
07:31 PM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
6
5
Atlas Talos (he/him)
A
In response to Jade Hellcat.
it's anti-SW, which I really don't like, and which has a large LGBT overlap. I see why people are upset though I agree it's not a 1:1 comparison
07:54 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
0
Jade Hellcat
A
In response to Jade Hellcat.
Like, I posted a shoot from my breast feeding photo session and it was promptly retweeted between two videos of porn.
I was upset about this and when I tweeted my anger, a man screenshot my angry tweet and called me "an entitled white woman" for expecting people to respect me.
07:37 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
0
Jade Hellcat
A
In response to Jade Hellcat.
So, here's where the clarity I'd want would be. Because it's clear that some people believe breast feeding is the same as porn.
But that's absolutely disgusting to me and I think it should be normalized.
07:39 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
0
Syckhero
A
In response to Jade Hellcat.
Because it isn't. People are acting like Bouzy will use this to negate LGBTQ+ with no proof that's what will happen. Ignoring Chris has already stated that won't happen, likely because the clause is clearly talking about sexually explicit content
07:37 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
2
DeucesWild Bear
A
In response to Jade Hellcat.
Lawdy, I am LGBTQ and I see absolutely NO connection.
07:33 PM - Feb 19, 2023
1
3
Jade Hellcat
A
In response to DeucesWild Bear.
Same lol
07:38 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
2

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}