Jade Hellcat
A
I guess I'm confused how "no pornography" rule equates to anti LGBTQ+. I'm not defending anyone. I am personally unsure about the vagueness of the wording, but I know it would be impossible to include every single thing in a ToA.
Just not sure how it's anti LGBTQ+
07:31 PM - Feb 19, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
6
5
Syckhero
A
Because it isn't. People are acting like Bouzy will use this to negate LGBTQ+ with no proof that's what will happen. Ignoring Chris has already stated that won't happen, likely because the clause is clearly talking about sexually explicit content
In response to Jade Hellcat.
07:37 PM - Feb 19, 2023
0
2

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}