Mark Rubin
A
Researchers don't cite each other's work correctly:

New study finds that "approximately one in every 10 citations completely mischaracterizes prior research."

Cobb et al. (2023): https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001138

#ScienceSpoutible
#AcademicSpoutible
#academicchatter
02:31 PM - Feb 26, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
12
17
Lil
A
In response to Mark Rubin.
If the ten percent turns into newspaper click-bait, it compounds and amplifies the problem.
02:49 PM - Feb 26, 2023
0
1
Ga9
A
In response to Mark Rubin.
I am shocked. Shocked, I say!
02:41 PM - Feb 26, 2023
1
1
Mark Rubin
A
In response to Ga9.
😄 I know! I think 1 in 10 is an underestimate!
03:10 PM - Feb 26, 2023
0
0
Laury Silvers
A
In response to Mark Rubin.
This is so common. I peer reviewed a piece citing my work incorrectly. It was obvious they had not cited others correctly, too. I offered clarification and constructive critique. Corrected paper, no change. They printed it anyway. Turned out to be the work of a respected colleague.
02:37 PM - Feb 26, 2023
1
3
Mark Rubin
A
In response to Laury Silvers.
Terrible! All you can do is try to do your job well! But yes, your colleague should have done theirs better too!
03:17 PM - Feb 26, 2023
1
1
Angela Thompson
A
In response to Mark Rubin.
Excellent study -just need to make sure I cited it correctly when used 😆
( seriously it’s been a bit of a problem in some aspects of literacy research and what is roughly referred to a ‘dyslexia debate’)
02:36 PM - Feb 26, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}