Sabine Savvidis
A
Can someone explain to me how an 1864 law - which must have been a law under the Confederacy - can still be valid when the territory no longer exists?
03:26 PM - Apr 09, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
11
20
💜 Callie 💜
A
In response to Sabine Savvidis.
It’s because the Confederacy still exists. It alive and well within the ranks of “conservatism”. No one ever really asks:
What exactly is it that these folks want to conserve/preserve? 🤔 They only seem to have an issue with social advancement that’s inclusive of others.
01:45 PM - Apr 10, 2024
1
3
Sabine Savvidis
A
In response to 💜 Callie 💜.
I guess many Europeans have difficulties understanding the length and depth of all this. Yes, we have Orban, but he's the outlier. When I talk to friends or colleagues, they are often flabbergasted.
01:58 PM - Apr 10, 2024
1
1
John Roche
A
In response to Sabine Savvidis.
Arizona was not under Confederate control, although Confederate Texans occupied much of New Mexico until their defeat at the Battle of Glorieta Pass, March 1862.
04:00 PM - Apr 09, 2024
1
3
Sabine Savvidis
A
In response to John Roche.
TY - I'm collecting explanations!
04:04 PM - Apr 09, 2024
0
1
Celt MacGann
A
In response to Sabine Savvidis.
A law passed before women had any rights including voting. Our bodies-our choice, period.
03:46 PM - Apr 09, 2024
0
3
Ronald Alexander
A
In response to Sabine Savvidis.
You would be surprised by laws that are still in the book
Google your state
03:44 PM - Apr 09, 2024
1
4
Sabine Savvidis
A
In response to Ronald Alexander.
I'm intrigued by "Females are not allowed to do their own hair unless they are licensed by the state."
03:51 PM - Apr 09, 2024
1
1
Angelique Yaich
A
In response to Sabine Savvidis.
Exactly, the territory didn't even look like the current state until 1866.& didn't even license doctors until 1887.

Conservatives "grandfather in" all of the privileges of their ancestors to continue their unjust practices....
03:33 PM - Apr 09, 2024
0
4

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}