Nefarious Newt
A
thread 1/2
“Then there was Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was also deeply worried about the dangers facing a president from vengeful political rivals. As he put it, 'I am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives.'" LIKE FP45 NOW?!?!?
Truscha Quatrone @TQDemocrat
07:17 AM - Apr 26, 2024
07:29 AM - Apr 26, 2024
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
2
12
Nefarious Newt
A
thread 2/2
Perhaps Justice Gorsuch should NOT have brought up "vengeful political rivals," because he owes his SEAT to the animus towards a President by a vengeful Republican, Mitch McConnell.
07:30 AM - Apr 26, 2024
0
4
Ronald Alexander
A
What may or may not happen in the future wasn't the question. The question as I understand it is "Does the Constitution give total immunity to a President? For the life of me, I don't see where in the Constitution it says that.

Reading is very fundamental in this case
In response to Nefarious Newt.
07:38 AM - Apr 26, 2024
0
3

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}