Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Resurrecting Cicero.
“Jill Stein or Bust”

Now we have bust

See also, Horseshoe Theory
07:47 PM - Jul 15, 2023
0
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Nyah M.
He wasn’t disbarred, but took inactive status with no way to reapply for active practice In return, the Bar dropped its disciplinary proceedings against him.
06:49 PM - Jul 06, 2023
0
2
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Lucy.
The accounts have been suspended
12:56 PM - Jul 05, 2023
0
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Resurrecting Cicero.
As soon as search comes back up we can systematically report any others.
05:03 PM - Jul 04, 2023
0
3
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to ecsbrooklyn.
Reported all of them
04:59 PM - Jul 04, 2023
1
2
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Kuba☭.
Well that good to hear. There’s plenty of other examples unfortunately.
08:58 AM - Apr 22, 2023
0
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Josol.
The courts can be used to challenge unconstitutional statutes —and several elements of Florida’s wave of bills may be stricken, but at the end of the day voting is the most persistent remedy.
01:33 PM - Mar 05, 2023
0
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Stephen Wunderlich.
I think the general consensus is that Court and Spark really showed her talent and larger appeal. But I’m still partial to Blue for sentimental reasons.
03:37 PM - Mar 04, 2023
0
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Anton Brakhage.
Well first any code of conduct would need SCOTUS to be supportive of it. And it’s not a law per se, but rather canons that guide ethical behavior —a collective acknowledgment that certain standards should be followed. Here’s a good article for background https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mi...
10:08 PM - Mar 03, 2023
1
1
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Kai Hagen.
Indeed, hopefully Virginia learned its lesson and will vote him out in 2024.
07:51 AM - Feb 24, 2023
1
1
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Maria OLeary.
It is. Lawyers are bound by ethical rules that allow zealous advocacy, but prohibit making or suborning false statements, preferring evidence that the attorney knows or should know is unsupported, and making frivolous legal arguments.
10:34 AM - Feb 23, 2023
0
1
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Resurrecting Cicero.
When a formal complaint is filed, the jurisdiction of the Colorado Supreme Court is invoked and the justices will have final say in the adjudication of her case.
10:28 AM - Feb 23, 2023
0
1
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Karistina Lafae.
Not knowing who these people are means you’re missing the context of his spout. Concern about site policies is legitimate and through good faith dialogue consensus will be reached on what the community wants re: adult content. But the people in that Twitter space are acting in bad faith.
06:30 PM - Feb 21, 2023
0
1
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Aecwulf.
Screenshots please. Sounds fishy AF
03:30 PM - Feb 21, 2023
1
0
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Resurrecting Cicero.
PR attack firms and YouTube grifters who have monetized millions in racist hate speech. Thier collaboration is anything but organic and they are not trying to address any “injustice”
03:08 PM - Feb 21, 2023 (Edited)
0
7
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Karistina Lafae.
You appear to be under informed of the background on three of those people. Markle is a fame seeker capitalizing on a wave of hate speech against her half sister; Orr is a disgruntled student who is fabricating false narratives about Bouzy’s growth in followers; and Broughty is a shill for (cont.)
03:06 PM - Feb 21, 2023 (Edited)
2
11
Resurrecting Cicero
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
She’s suffering severe professional jealousy.
02:59 PM - Feb 21, 2023
0
4
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}