Dan Dan
A
In response to I Smoked Threads.
No, they've learned that there is a permit fee so they can do whatever they want. Hold someone accountable and things will change.
04:48 AM - Feb 19, 2024
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Lucy / solarpunk dumpling ✨.
That's pretty nice work
07:33 AM - Dec 22, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to SueinAZ.
I was gonna post write to that claim but decided I'd do it later
04:35 PM - Dec 16, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Andrea Billingsley.
Yes!!
02:08 PM - Oct 16, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Grace Clench.
Well, honestly, I'd pay to see that 😁
08:16 PM - Oct 03, 2023
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Grace Clench.
He'll continue to spew his garbage, the judge will fine him, he'll fundraise another million off it
07:56 PM - Oct 03, 2023
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to CarbonHal.
I understand that's what the article said, my point is that if the Pentagon is that inept at their accounting then it needs to be addressed. We know they lose billions, it shouldn't be accepted as part of their business model.
11:24 AM - Sep 08, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
The thing is, JJ knows all this and doesn't give a shit. His noise is nothing but performative smoke intended to keep the rabble roused up. He knows it won't go anywhere but the headlines, and feeding the trolls never works
11:03 AM - Sep 08, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to CarbonHal.
I'm sorry, but $6.2B is an accounting error? It's way past time for the Pentagon to justify it's spending
10:56 AM - Sep 08, 2023
1
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Michelle Elle.
Thank you!
05:38 AM - Sep 01, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Anita B.
Where cops fear to tread
07:06 PM - Aug 28, 2023
0
6
Dan Dan
A
In response to ✨Witchy Woman✨.
Done
05:56 PM - Aug 26, 2023
0
3
Dan Dan
A
In response to Ricardo Lundi, DPM.
Risky Business
09:45 PM - Aug 25, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to CarbonHal.
Now do the same for the US Senate, Congress and SC.
08:10 AM - Aug 25, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Doctor Michael.
So it's ok then?
08:55 PM - Aug 23, 2023
1
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Doctor Michael.
08:49 PM - Aug 23, 2023
2
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Doctor Michael.
That's a very legit question
08:39 PM - Aug 23, 2023
1
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Nana of the Shire.
Jeffrey Epstein
😁
02:06 PM - Aug 16, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Ola.
And that would likely change spoutible for the worse
02:01 PM - Aug 16, 2023
2
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Shawn Scott.
Are you trying to say they're full of shit?
07:56 AM - Aug 15, 2023
1
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to CNN Bot.
It's only tricky because they want it to seem that way. I'll bet a 6th grader can see the right and wrong, so they should be able to. If Thomas was so sure of his position, why did he try to hide his behavior
01:08 PM - Aug 13, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Blue Dog Doug.
I'm not sure of your point. There is no coal mining in Maine, there are currently 2 very controversial proposals for new transmission lines to bring power from CA, pasture lands as well as forests are being taken over for solar fields. And now a lithium mine.
07:09 AM - Aug 13, 2023
0
0
Dan Dan
A
In response to Sara Spouts Off.
We clearcut mtn tops for windmills, decimate woodlands for solar, destroy wilderness for power lines, and now destroy more land, all for "eco-friendly" electricity. All we're doing is shifting the damage. We can't sustain this.
09:27 AM - Aug 12, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to FirstAmendmentGirl.
I'm more cynical, it could be good. It's certainly less bad than what was proposed
04:43 PM - Aug 10, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Haruka (RELOCATED).
This is what I was thinking
12:22 PM - Aug 10, 2023
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Haruka (RELOCATED).
Ok then, I've not seen that color pumpkin seed before
12:19 PM - Aug 10, 2023 (Edited)
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Haruka (RELOCATED).
Pumpkin, or watermelon?
12:11 PM - Aug 10, 2023
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Randall.
For a happy second I thought it said charges, not changes.
04:49 AM - Aug 09, 2023
0
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Insley James.
I don't think that's it
07:41 AM - Aug 03, 2023
1
1
Dan Dan
A
In response to Serendipity.
I agree, I never suggested they could. The article gives no number for the supposed children they rescued. This is what I mean when they claim it's trafficking and kids, when it turns out it's almost always adult sex workers. It's a publicity stunt.
02:29 PM - Aug 02, 2023
0
0
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}