Thomas Patton
A
While I applaud the encouragement of engagement, and have had great interactions with many here, I'm hesitant to punish those that are perhaps just feeling their way around. Everyone has their own reasons for how they approach things. I say give them a chance. 💚
Scarab Rose @ScarabRose
I've suggested a security option in which we can automate the choice not to accept followers with less than x number of spouts or echoes or likes.
02:26 AM - Mar 07, 2023
04:13 AM - Mar 07, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
23
27
✨Witchy Woman✨
A
In response to Thomas Patton.
yeah we're not all social butterflies. Some ppl just read and don't engage. Let's not force them or make them feel not included.

whole damn point of this site was supposed to be inclusion.
04:17 AM - Mar 07, 2023
2
37
Nikki Jo
A
Exactly this! I see people elsewhere criticize the activity on here. They can't seem to wrap their heads around the fact this isn't the popularity pageant Twitter is. We just want to exist here, at our own pace, doing our own things. Those who do wish to grow an audience can and seem to easily.
In response to ✨Witchy Woman✨.
07:23 AM - Mar 07, 2023
2
24
Scarab Rose
A
In response to Nikki Jo.
I wasn't attempting to criticize. I am attempting to protect myself. I just want to know someone is real. It makes me a little nervous if someone has had no engagement at all. I know, though, that I can block later if needed. I follow back if they have at least liked a few spouts.
11:08 AM - Mar 07, 2023
1
1
Nikki Jo
A
In response to Scarab Rose.
Oh, I wasn't at you specifically(didn't see your OC but have seen others). I feel the caution! I don't think the solution is further alienating those who struggle with expression or choose not to engage most days. People do get falsely labeled as bots often enough. Fair frustrations all around, IMO.
08:27 AM - Mar 08, 2023
1
1
Just Corrigan
A
In response to Nikki Jo.
From acorns, oak tree grow....
11:03 AM - Mar 07, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}