Jeff Tiedrich
A
wait, do I have this right? nobody asked this jackass busybody to design a 'gay' web site — whatever the fuck that may be — but she took a stupid fucking hypothetical all the way to the Supreme Court and now we have state-sanctioned discrimination? fuck me, this is a shithole country
06:57 PM - Jun 30, 2023
Avatar Avatar Avatar
0
30
413
Zully Francisco
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
It needs to be reversed FFS!!!
09:17 AM - Jul 03, 2023
0
1
Maria Terrazas
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Banana Republican 😢
07:33 PM - Jul 02, 2023
0
1
Paul Stadler
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Will this allow businesses to turn away Trump supporters?
11:38 AM - Jul 02, 2023
0
3

Only followers of this user (DJay7000) can see their posts

Linden Rose
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Fake ass case, fake ass country
12:46 AM - Jul 02, 2023
0
3
Hava Salita
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
'tis very disgusting. hopefully she loses customers, and more importantly, buckets of cash from people boycotting her.
10:51 PM - Jul 01, 2023
1
2

Only followers of this user (DJay7000) can see their posts

Stevens
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Not only precedent out the window, so is having standing, apparently. The courts will take a case purely because they way someone loves males them feel icky and they think it's an affront to their beliefs in a fantasy novel.
07:50 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
3
Mel Meister
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Yep, I think you got it covered. This was setup by the Repubs to get a ruling.
05:55 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
1
Laura Topliffe
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Yes, all the way around.
02:20 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
1
Linda Holbrook
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Disgusting is right & they never should have taken this case! The most corrupt court in our history
12:09 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
1
Carol Glynn
B
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
TIME FOR BUSINESSES TO BAN MAGA FROM THEIR STORES. #BanTheGOP ! No longer welcome - bunch of fascists!
07:07 AM - Jul 01, 2023
0
2
Jeff Mistina 🐻
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Yes, you have it right.
11:35 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
0
Blair Houghton
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Ayup. White lady just got ushered into the Wizard and given whatever the fuck she wanted, because she fit the slippers Leonard Leo had already bought.
09:43 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
3
Sweyn Forkbeard
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Yes, it’s a totally made-up case. The Court had to ignore one of the basic rules of jurisprudence to take it: the existence of a case or controversy. Then these clowns complain that the public doesn’t respect them. They don’t seem to respect themselves.
09:25 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
6
Edward Hashima
A
In response to Sweyn Forkbeard.
They sure AF don’t respect us.
08:38 PM - Jul 01, 2023
0
2
Dean Barnett
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Stand by for more Club Q and Pulse style murders.
08:21 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
0
Violetta
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
This is what is MOST INCREDULOUS about the entire case. THERE WAS NO CASE❗️❗️
#scotus tried a COMPLETELY made up, hypothetical case❗️❗️😡😡
#FUBAR
08:07 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
8
Clarke
A
In response to Violetta.
If it can be proven that it was not a real case, they have to throw it on the garbage heap. That is a firmly established legal principle. The case was moot.
08:20 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
8
Maura
B
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
SCOTUS is single handedly destroying the rule of law
08:05 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
3
ML Hart
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
So... she stole the gentleman's address, phone number, biz name, to create a fake letter asking for a gay wedding website... maybe he should sue her for defamation and take *that* all the way to Supremely Stupid Court.
07:44 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
29
R.A. Roth
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
In 1998, the SC ruled that hypotheticals can't be ruled on. So much for "judicial precedent".
07:33 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
17
Aly C
A
In response to R.A. Roth.
aaah. But then their financial backers got involved and hey, whaddya know… we CAN rule on hypotheticals…🙄
08:22 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
3
Jodi B
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
So now anyone can take a case all the way to SCOTUS, even if there's not a case to bring because nothing actually happened? How the hell did a "what if" scenario get all the way to the Supreme Court? 🤬🤬🤬 They're a joke!
07:33 PM - Jun 30, 2023
1
7
Maura
B
In response to Jodi B.
Their needs to be an investigation into this by the Senate
08:06 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
3
Alfalpha Male ✔️
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Nope, nobody. They legally had no standing. There's no proof they were ever a real business, just another random LLC.
07:19 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
9
Daniel Kreutzer
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
I was thinking of starting a business but I was worried I might have to interact with MAGA Republicans. Now the Supreme Court says I can discriminate against them. What a relief! (I think that's how it works)
07:14 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
27
♿ ♀️ Laura Durnell
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
The fact SCOTUS took this case proves the majority of the justices are illegitimate.
07:10 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
14
Pro-Science Establishment Dem
B
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
Yep. That's it in a nutshell.
06:57 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
1

 

{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}