C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Jeff Tiedrich.
But have you considered that they just really want to be president?
10:42 AM - Dec 28, 2023
0
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Jeff(Teach).
It's so sad. I remember first watching the Arab Spring and the Iranian Green Movement unfold on twitter over a decade ago. Seeing how far the platform has fallen since then is heartbreaking
09:30 AM - Oct 10, 2023
0
2
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
That sounds like something you should maybe read up on, eh?
05:48 PM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
Ok. I'm glad that you are concerned that innocents will be killed. Thank you for confirming that.

It's been hard to see people online ignore the fact that innocent people (children, the elderly, the infirm) will be killed in Gaza and were killed in Israel. We're losing sight of the people, here.
03:15 PM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Shäna.
Reading the callousness and bloodthirst of social media reactions to this entire calamity has been one of the darkest aspects of the entire crisis.

People don't even seem to care if the hostages taken to Gaza are killed in the bombardments.
02:53 PM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
If they kill one of the human shields taken as hostage during the raids? Will you care about collateral damage then?

My criticism is of the fantasy that these bombs will only kill Hamas. Reading opinions like yours on social media is honestly a harrowing experience. You don't seem to care.
02:48 PM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Christopher Bouzy.
Twitter is currently a racist cesspool. It's never been more apparent.
11:47 AM - Oct 09, 2023
0
2
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
I literally, in my last reply to you, said I believe Israel has the right to defend itself. It absolutely has the right to retaliate.

Again, you're assigning me a position I don't have. I'm fairly sure you're not even reading what I'm writing.
11:13 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
You are assigning me a viewpoint I don't have. I very clearly stated my support for Israel's right to exist, defend itself, and retaliate.

What Hamas did was evil and they need to face justice.

But you are guilty of handwaving away very real innocent suffering in the interest of "score keeping."
10:28 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
Yes, Hamas hiding amongst the population is both calculated and evil. That doesn't mean the Innocents they're hiding amongst deserve to die.

Please, I'm begging you. Find some nuance and humanity in your views.

What Hamas did was mass murder. That does not justify collective massacre in return.
10:19 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
10:16 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
Again, with all due respect: that's not true. Footage of the aftermath of these strikes easily disprove that. There is no missile that magically only kills enemy combatants. Your anger at Hamas is justified. Your apathy towards innocent collateral damage is disheartening.
10:14 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
Referring to all people in Gaza as terrorists is now "rule of law?" How'd you arrive at that conclusion?
08:32 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Blair Houghton.
With all due respect, that's the same kind of semantic cuteness that helped Americans get behind the wholesale destruction of Iraq. Israel has a right to exist, defend itself, and retaliate - especially after this horror. But let's not pretend they have magic bombs that only kill Hamas fighters.
12:01 AM - Oct 09, 2023
1
2
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Sabine.
SCOTUS is limited to hearing cases that go through multiple levels of appeal. In practice, political actors in the US pick and choose where, when, and how to file suit so that their cases are guaranteed to be ruled on by SCOTUS. These student loan, AA, and LGBTQ cases are perfect examples.
12:10 PM - Jun 30, 2023 (Edited)
1
1
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to C.J. Nowak.
The GOP is also notorious for bringing suit specifically with the intent of arriving before the Supreme Court. American political actors are well-versed in gaming the judicial system to provide the court with cases it wishes to hear - especially our modern Trump Supreme Court.
12:08 PM - Jun 30, 2023
0
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Sabine.
In an early SCOTUS case, Marbury v. Madison, the court gave itself authority to conduct judicial review and rule on the constitutionality of legislation and executive action. It's not anywhere in the constitution, though. It has no formal rules defining its scope or limits. They can just say 'no.'
12:03 PM - Jun 30, 2023
2
1
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to J.D. Cunegan.
There is no part of Trump's psychological constitution that would ever allow him to "bow out "
08:57 AM - Jun 21, 2023
0
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
While I appreciate that you want compromise, I'm afraid you're valuing process over substance. Too many people are dying. It's time for solutions. Incrementalism has been used against progressivism for the past three decades and we've still arrived here all the same.
09:03 AM - Mar 09, 2023
0
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
I appreciate your taking the time to respond, even though I very much disagree with you here.

@cbouzy This spout chaining is a bit opaque and hard to follow. I also had a few issues when trying to respond in a chain. Is this something you all might be able to take a look at for legibility?
08:54 AM - Mar 08, 2023 (Edited)
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
3) The problem is the guns. They need to go. Full stop.
Quibbling about the appropriate terminology to use in the conversation is an obvious and infuriating distraction.
08:51 AM - Mar 08, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
2) I’m going to flip the tables around on you here: perhaps gun supporters need to stop expecting such coddling. Perhaps responsible gun owners need to adjust their tack. There’s nothing more alienating than this kind of “concern,” I’m afraid.
08:51 AM - Mar 08, 2023
0
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
1) I’m curious as to why ‘responsible gun owners’ are the group that need to be treated with kids gloves here and not, for example, shooting survivors or the families of those lost in shootings. I think it’s very telling that you’re more concerned about how gun owners feel than anybody else.
08:50 AM - Mar 08, 2023
1
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
The 'over 100 shootings' statistic is defined by 4 or more people being shot. The FBI defines it as 4 or more killed. I see a split hair here and I'm asking you now why you're splitting it.

I'm sorry, but this doesn't seem like a good faith argument on your part.

https://tinyurl.com/f7xwyu...
07:32 PM - Mar 07, 2023
5
0
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Brent Maverick.
What sort of misinformation is this? Are the statistics incorrect?
09:27 AM - Mar 07, 2023
1
2
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to K.B. Wagers.
I look forward to checking your work out!
10:48 AM - Feb 14, 2023
1
1
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to John Muller.
When they started playing my favorite songs at the grocery store, I knew it was over for me.
03:28 PM - Feb 12, 2023
0
9
C.J. Nowak
A
In response to Carrie Kwiatkowski.
I'd honestly welcome one at this point. However, I have a feeling these UFOs are an escalation from China after their balloon was blatantly shot down in front of the international community?
10:10 AM - Feb 12, 2023
1
1
loading...
{{ notificationModalContent }} {{ promptModalMessage }}